Buy on Amazon
$30
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1185 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $30.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700T - $0.24 vs $0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Pentium G640 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
