Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1675 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $30.0 vs $95.97
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7600 - $0.26 vs $0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G640 - 131 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
115
87.78625954198473%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
35.61643835616439%
Price, $
$95.97
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |