Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $37.49 vs $165.86
- Up to 71% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-11600KF - $0.17 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G630 - 286 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 12 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
221
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
29%
Price, $
$165.86
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |