Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than FX-6100 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $29.65 vs $95.31
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Pentium G4400 - $0.27 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 6 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
32.142857142857146%
Price, $
$95.31
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3750 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
97.34513274336283%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |