Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4590T is 942 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-4590T - $29.65 vs $75.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-4590T - $0.2 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Performs up to 15% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
86.7816091954023%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1960 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
46.51162790697675%
Price, $
$75
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1962 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |