Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Pentium G3220T - 165 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220T - 24 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$708.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $708.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |