Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220 is 1220 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3220 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
320
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9896 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |