Buy on Amazon
$475
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Pentium B980 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3777 days newer than Pentium B980.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B980
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 69% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium B980 - 732 vs 433 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B980 - 32 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
732
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$475
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for $475 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium B980
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B980 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Pentium B980 or Core i9-13900F
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
425 FPS
$4/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i9-13900F
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
