Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium 987 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1651 days newer than Pentium 987.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 987
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium 987 - 103 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 987 - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 987 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |