Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium 2117U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1804 days newer than Pentium 2117U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2117U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium 2117U - 103 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2117U - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2117U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |