Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Pentium 2020M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1585 days newer than Pentium 2020M.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2020M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium 2020M - 120 vs 117 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2020M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |