Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 183 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 2600X - 415 vs 407 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $99.97 vs $587.46
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-9920X - $0.25 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
415
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
17%
Price, $
$587.46
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2345 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
407
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |