Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-6100 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $100.0 vs $587.46
- Up to 82% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-9920X - $0.78 vs $4.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.45/FPS
17%
Price, $
$587.46
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17264 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |