Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 534 vs 526 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $109.99 vs $360.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-9900T - $0.21 vs $0.67 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $360 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
526
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |