Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2410 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G640 - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $30.0 vs $286.74
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900KF - $0.26 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
12%
Price, $
$286.74
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |