Buy on Amazon
$339
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 188% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8350 - 121 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8350 - $2.8 vs $4.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $185.0 vs $339.0
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$339
54%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-9900 Coffee Lake Processor 3.1GHz 8.0GT/s 16MB LGA 1151 CPU, Retail
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3195 minutes ago
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
