Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9880H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9880H is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9880H
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 106 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9880H
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9880H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
