Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7980XE is 1733 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7980XE
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 536 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-7980XE - $37.0 vs $1286.0
- Up to 97% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-7980XE - $0.07 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-7980XE - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13934 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7980XE | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |