Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2780 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $37.0 vs $897.22
- Up to 95% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.2 vs $4.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 19% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G1610 - 217 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.13/FPS
4%
Price, $
$897.22
4%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
