Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 2146 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $37.0 vs $768.88
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i7-9800X - $0.32 vs $5.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 30% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G1610 - 152 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
76.97368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5309 minutes ago
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.06/FPS
6.32411067193676%
Price, $
$768.88
4%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-9800X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC3)
Buy for $768.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
31.140350877192986%
Multi-Core
739
10.05031959744322%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
