Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3698 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 114% better in War Thunder than Core i7-4820K - 300 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-4820K
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $199.88 vs $433.00
- Up to 1% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-14900K - $1.43 vs $1.44 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
140
47%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |