Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3047 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 144% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-4820K - 144 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $143.57 vs $199.88
- Up to 71% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-4820K - $1.00 vs $3.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7259 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7259 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |