Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3332 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Halo Infinite than FX-8320E - 181 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $178.02 vs $433.11
- Up to 51% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-14900K - $1.17 vs $2.39 per FPS
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
49%
Price, $
$433.11
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $433.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |