Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2256 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 442% better in League of Legends than FX-8320E - 298 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 71% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-8320E - $0.94 vs $3.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $178.02 vs $278.99
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$278.99
63%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $278.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |