Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2256 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320E - 217 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-8320E - $175.99 vs $178.02
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320E - $0.81 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |