Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1981 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 499 vs 404 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $250.0 vs $575.0
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75914 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
404
80.96192384769539%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
100%
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
37.809983896940416%
Multi-Core
6976
31.951632849356475%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |