Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-10700KF - 158 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $217.67 vs $585.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900KS - $1.6 vs $3.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12248 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$217.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $217.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |