Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $208.99 vs $529.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900F - $1.87 vs $3.87 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700KF - 137 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6042 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
48%
Price, $
$529.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |