Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $214.99 vs $589.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900KS - $1.6 vs $3.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 25% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-10700KF - 167 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.53/FPS
45%
Price, $
$589.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |