Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2262 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 80 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $435.0 vs $1595.95
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 44 vs 32 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77783 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
43.040293040293044%
Multi-Core
9619
55.862709797316924%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 22 |
32 | Threads | 44 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |