Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 198 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $435.0 vs $1555.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 64 vs 32 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77785 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
181
91.41414141414141%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1555
27%
Buy for $1,555 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
59.92673992673993%
Multi-Core
14008
81.3519948893664%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 32 |
32 | Threads | 64 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |