Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 7% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 217 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $270.0 vs $480.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-13900 - $1.34 vs $2.21 per FPS
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $480 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |