Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3208 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 39% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G640 - 125 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $30.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-11900K - $0.33 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |