Buy on Amazon
$827.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1610 - 219 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $37.0 vs $827.6
- Up to 95% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10920X - $0.18 vs $3.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i9-10920X Desktop Processor 12 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $827.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
