Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $249.0 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75423 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
213
95.94594594594594%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
30%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
66.42087351106069%
Multi-Core
7539
82.35743937076688%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |