Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 113 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $176.0 vs $249.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - $1.73 vs $2.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
78.63636363636363%
Price, $
$249
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 345 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
102
90.2654867256637%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$176
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $176 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
63.187748156551336%
Multi-Core
5489
59.96285776709635%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |