Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $244.0 vs $460.74
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 126% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i9-10900F - 86 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Core i9-10900F - $5.36 vs $6.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $244 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$460.74
52%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |