Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-10900F vs Core i9-7960X

Core i9-10900F vs Core i9-7960X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10371 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i9-7960X

2.8 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series Processor 16 Cores up to 4.2 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W

Buy for $347.48 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10371 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10371 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i9-7960X

2.8 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series Processor 16 Cores up to 4.2 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W

Buy for $347.48 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10371 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 972 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7960X.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F

  • Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7960X - 181 vs 174 FPS
  • Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $225.0 vs $347.48
  • Up to 38% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7960X - $1.24 vs $2.0 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 65 vs 165 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
This is a free version of Total War: WARHAMMER III.
Total War: WARHAMMER III

Total War: WARHAMMER III

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

181

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.24/FPS

100%

Price, $

$225

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10371 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017


FPS

174

96%

Value, $/FPS

$2/FPS

62%

Price, $

$347.48

64%

Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series Processor 16 Cores up to 4.2 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W

Buy for $347.48 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10371 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1676

100%

Multi-Core

8426

80%

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017


Single-Core

1376

82%

Multi-Core

10496

100%

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo

Intel Core i9-10900F

vs
Intel Core i9-7960X Logo

Intel Core i9-7960X

Apr 30th, 2020
Release DateSep 1st, 2017
Core i9CollectionCore i9
Comet LakeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket 1200SocketIntel Socket 2066
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
10Cores
16
20Threads
32
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed2.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.2 GHz
65 W
TDP165 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
28.0xMultiplier28.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.