Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-920 - 147 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $90.0 vs $244.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900F - $0.74 vs $1.66 per FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $244 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |