Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 240 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $217.99 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74794 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
76.0143198090692%
Multi-Core
7454
88.46427723712318%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |