Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1820 - 734 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $39.59 vs $270.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10850K - $0.06 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
734
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
16.216216216216218%
Price, $
$270
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
674
91.82561307901908%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
28.218390804597703%
Multi-Core
825
9.069920844327177%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |