Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3900 - 181 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $70.0 vs $245.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-9700K - $0.44 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $245 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |