Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6700T - 576 vs 531 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $99.9 vs $295.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-9700F - $0.19 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5154 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
531
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |