Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i5-5675C - 61 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $90.0 vs $260.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-9700F - $1.58 vs $4.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.26/FPS
37.08920187793427%
Price, $
$260
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3679 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
57
93.44262295081968%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Single-Core
1340
86.50742414460943%
Multi-Core
4079
65.20140664961637%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |