Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-970 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3573 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-970.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Core i7-970 - 280 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-970 - $225.0 vs $229.95
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-970 - $0.8 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-970 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-970 - 20 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $229.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 19th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-970 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 19th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |