Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4599 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $100.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-12900F - $0.27 vs $0.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-950 - 470 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5052 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
470
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
29%
Price, $
$432.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5051 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |