Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 1461 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $100.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 79% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-4765T - $0.61 vs $2.97 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Core i7-950 - 168 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6555 minutes ago
Intel Core i7 i7-4765T Quad-core (4 Core) 2 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150OEM Pack - 1 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 3 GHz Overclocking Speed - 22 nm - 3 Number of Monitors Supported - Intel HD 4600 Gr
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6556 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
