Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3229 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-940XM - 135 vs 127 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |