Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2608 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-940XM - 137 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 32 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$493
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $493 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarksfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |