Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2994 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Core i7-940XM - 273 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarksfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |